Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Selective use of quotes in the Washington Post

I was reading the World Opinion Round up in the WaPo this morning and got to the section that was concerning world opinion on the issue of providing funding to Hamas. When you read this blurb:

The monarchist Jordan Times welcomed the U.S. announcement over the weekend that it would continue to provide some aid to Palestinians via nongovernmental organizations.

"Since a substantial amount of US aid is given directly to infrastructure projects outside the [Palestinian Authority], Washington, for all its bluster, appears to have started reconciling itself with the new democratic Palestinian reality," the Jordan Times editors said Sunday.

This hints that Jordon is not opposed to the new government in Palestine. What is interesting though is that this editorial continues on to state:

Unfortunately, as throughout the Intifada, Israel is continuing its targeting of Palestinians. Its recent bombardment of northern Gaza and incursions into the Balata refugee camp near Nablus seem evidence, if such was needed, that Israel has not learnt any lessons from the recent past. Indeed, at a time when Palestinian groups are largely holding fire, the only rational explanation for the recent Israeli escalation is that Israel is hoping it will provoke a reaction. Perhaps Israel is afraid of the outside world fully accepting the results of Palestinian elections.

The international community needs to step in to ensure that Israel ceases such provocation. Palestinians would be wise to maintain their cool, however difficult it may be.

That to me is a much more important statement than the one Jefferson Morley selected from the Jordon Times. I also find it very ironic that Morely doesn't stress that Israel's decision to not give Palestine tax revenue is the largest issue here. The dollar amount of US aid to Palestine is miniscule when compared to what Israel is going to cut off. It's also important to recognize that the Palestine people are not responding to the violence by Israel. Yet there is very little attention placed on this in the US media. If Israel continues, eventually violence will happen and only those of us who have been paying attention will realize what led up to it.

As CNN reports:

The European Union said Monday that it will give the Palestinian Authority $143 million in emergency aid before the newly elected Hamas leadership forms a Palestinian government.

The US is on the one hand threatening to cut off funding, demanding the return of 50 million dollars and then saying they think the EU funding is "welcome"?

This was also not mentioned in the WaPo piece though it is the source used for most of this article:

Qatar's Al Watan daily on February 22 blasted the Bush administration's attempts to persuade Arabs to stop assistance to "their Palestinian brothers", saying that the joint American-Israeli blackmail was intended to force the Palestinians to accept the occupation.

The pro-government paper asked what right US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had to incite Arabs against their Arab brothers by stopping funds to the Palestinians "while it [Washington] supports Israeli terrorism, finances Jewish settlements and protects Israeli crimes".

10 comments:

historymike said...

No one wants to see the looming crisis, Lisa.

The Israelis claim to be withholding tax and duty funds to force Hamas to recognize Israel's right to exist, although I suspect that Israel would be hostile to Hamas irrespective of the party's stance.

There have been a lot of calls in Israel since the defeat of Fatah to end the agreement that was signed in 1994. Quite a few Israelis believe that the deal is off now that Fatah is out, since they signed the peace accord with Arafat.

Bush & Co. need to jump in and mediate this dispute before it gets out of hand.

Unknown said...

They are once again ignoring what the end result will be. Of course the response will be "See we told you Hamas was going to attack" rather than the true situation that eventually they are going to respond to being provoked.

Not to mention this also continues to influence anti-US sentiment in the middle east.

I understand Israel's concerns about Hamas but creating conditions that are more likely to cause not only more violence but give Hamas an excuse they can use for failure rather than to place them in a situation where they have to actually govern? To me isn't the smart way of dealing with this.

It's interesting so far though none of the middle eastern countries have stepped up to offer assistance. Will they just continue with the rhetoric or will they put "their money where their mouth" is as far as making sure the PA can meet it's expenses.

Scott G said...

I think we need to invade Israel and the Palestinian lands. Maybe even Syria and Lebanon. If we can't keep them from fighting by force, maybe we can get them to unite against us.

We did the same thing with Iraq that Israel does. We would taunt them in the No Fly Zone and then say they provoked us

Unknown said...

I think we should send Judge Judy in there.

Scott G said...

That would be fun to watch.

Israel: God gave this land to us.

Palestine: God gave this land to us.

Judge Judy: Do either of you have a deed or lease agreement.

Israel: The Tenach

Palestine: The Qu'ran

Judge Judy: Case dismissed. Neither of you own the land

Unknown said...

That would be funny. I'd love to see her tell Hamas to SIT DOWN and shut up, then tell Israel to stop interrupting or she'd throw them out.

:-)

Scott G said...

I think I am going to put together a skit for the Daily Show

Unknown said...

I think I'd probably enjoy that.

:-)

Mark said...

Some of us will remember, Lisa. That's not much of a consolation, but... If hope could stop this crisis, we'd have peace on Earth by now.

Unknown said...

That's true Stephanie, some of us will know, though I think we'd all rather have it just not happen. There's not much chance but you are also right there is still hope.

:-)