Who really cares about David Sirota?

On some parts of the net today there is outrage and alot of discussion about David Sirota, who is a blogger. He's also a blogger that I think everyone who reads him, knows supports Sherrod Brown not Paul Hackett.

But today we have:

Ohio Second

The next Left

Dadahead

And lots more in addition to the Kos thread I've linked in the Title. All blogging about a blogger. Yes, I am being a hypocrit by blogging about their blogging about a blogger.

If as it was stated on Kos and attributed to Majikthise that David has done similar things in the past, then why keep reading him? Why keep giving his sites the hits and continue to link him? Don't we have more important things to discuss in regards to Brown v Hackett than did Sirota misuse quotation marks and create an inflammatory article heading?

It's simple...Sirota supports Brown, he's probably not going to write nice things about Paul Hackett...Until Hackett beats Brown in the primaries then David will have to decide does he support Hackett then or start writing nice things about DeWine...

The blogosophere is already dividing enough over this topic and while I have contributed my two cents worth on that issue? Some of this is not necessary unless the goal is to make DeWine supporters smile.

:-)