Monday, July 24, 2006

American Dream Initiative

Well the Democrats have unveiled their plan:

The American Dream Initiative includes proposals that DLC President Bruce Reed said would cost $450 billion to $500 billion over 10 years. He said the cost could be offset by eliminating corporate subsidies in the tax code, cutting out 100,000 unnecessary federal contractors and making a more aggressive effort to identify and collect taxes now going uncollected by the Internal Revenue Service. The initiative also calls for a return to pay-as-you-go budget rules in Washington, which means that all spending on new programs must be offset by cuts elsewhere.

The centerpiece proposal would provide additional support for college costs, with the goal of increasing the number of college graduates by 1 million a year by 2015. The proposal includes $150 billion in block grants for states to ease rising tuition costs and a consolidated tax credit for students. To qualify, states and universities would have to limit tuition increases to the rate of inflation.

Other ideas include requirements for employers to establish retirement accounts for all workers and a refundable tax credit for savers; "baby bonds" that would create a government-funded savings account of $500 for every child born in the United States; a refundable tax credit to help provide the down payment on housing; universal health care for children; and benefits for small businesses to lower the cost of providing health insurance to workers.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I like the pay as you go part. It's ashamed that you libs didn't support Newt's Balanced Budget Amendment in the 90's. We all would be better off today.

The rest is just a bunch of political candy for politicians to hand out and will have no meaningful impact whatsoever. What's the difference between Bush's tax cut checks in August 2001 and 2003 and the $500 per baby checks? Nothing, just political candy to buy votes. It's very sad.

You folks need to start thinking big again. The New Deal and Great Society were big. They had noble goals and inspired people to support them. The downside of both of these has been they lack checks and balances or controls on them as the grow and times change. They become inflexible and often miss the mark years later and inspire a 1/3 of our nation to oppose any government program no matter how good it is because they correctly fear it will become a burden on their wallets down the road.

For you libs to be not only relevant, but great again, you need to inspire the same passion for great things, but build in modern controls such as competetion, empowered leaders who can fire non performers, employee performance incentives, and measuring results - because ultimately that's what matters.

If you keep putting forth lame initiatives like this, you'll never through out the Republicans.

Good luck.

NJ Swing Voter

Cyberseaer said...

Ever notice that the biggest critics always need to be anonymous and used the wrong words.

Example:

"If you keep putting forth lame initiatives like this, you'll never through out the Republicans."

Not for nothing, but I think NJ Swinger meant "throw" out the Republicans.

As for my two cents (and I will be expecting change) and that is well and good, but until the Democrats can get a unified front, they are doomed to be the second class party.

Hooda Thunkit (Dave Zawodny) said...

I fear that both parties will be breaking our wallets trying to out bribe each other.

Now, anyone wishing to curb spending and work on diminishing our children's indebtedness, definitely has my attention, and my vote.