Saturday, February 25, 2006

Toledo terrorist suspects in context....

If you have read the indictment of the three Toledo area residents who were arrested last week in terrorist related charges, then read the above linked Washington Post article? You will probably make some interesting comparisons and disctinctions. Some information from the Post article:

Two key members of a "Virginia jihad network," which was described by prosecutors as one of the most serious terrorism cases since Sept. 11, 2001, will be freed from prison within weeks after a judge drastically reduced their sentences yesterday.

Eleven men, all but one from the Washington suburbs, were originally charged in 2003 with preparing for jihad by playing paintball and firing weapons in Virginia and at terrorist camps overseas. Nine were convicted. Prosecutors have not alleged that the group was planning domestic attacks, but some of the men admitted they were preparing to fight U.S. troops.

Juliette Kayyem, a terrorism expert at Harvard University, said it is rare for defendants in major terrorism cases to be freed, in great part because of the government's intervention. "This is yet another example of where the government's public portrayal of a case ends up being much more complicated than advertised," she said.

Part of the reason these men and another one had their sentences reduced was because they cooperated with the government in other cases. I'm not sure how much information the three Toledo area men have as to other cases or what kind of cooperation they will give or even have knowledge of when their case comes to trial. Yet, when you read the indictment the three men from this area seem to have done alot less than this group was convicted of.

3 comments:

historymike said...

Connecting all the dots makes an interesting "conspiracy," but the individual acts by themselves seem fairly minor, Lisa.

If there are some phone calls taped it might be easier to prove a conspiracy, but it looks like the strength of the case will be "The Trainer," the as-yet unknown operative who turned in the suspects.

A jury might not buy the conspiracy if it is based largely on the testimony of one man.

Unknown said...

I don't think the cases are related, what interested me was the claims made back when this group of 11 were arrested versus what they ended up all being charged with and now several having their sentences reduced. Though it should be noted one of the 11 did get a sentence of life in prison.

Given it seems as a comparison these 11 were charged with more than the three men locally? That is the angle I was looking at it from. If these three local men have other names/contacts and they cooperate they could possibly end up with a similar light sentence if convicted.

I also thought the statement by Juliette Kayyem was interesting to note.

Anonymous said...

Keep up the good work » »