The CAP documents

Those that are actively against Alito are almost salivating over the belief that the archive documents from the Concerned Alumni of Princeton held in the Library of Congress will contain what they need to stop the confirmation.

Speculation is running rampant that Republicans are in a panic over this. Makes for good blog material if you want to create interest but is it true?

Depends on how much value you place in this:

The New York Times previously reviewed the documents, which are in the papers of William A. Rusher, an early leader of the group and a former publisher of National Review. The Times reported in November that the documents and others at Princeton gave no indication that Judge Alito was among the major donors to the group and was not active in it. In an online interview on Wednesday with National Review, Mr. Rusher said he did not remember Judge Alito.

"He certainly was not very heavily involved in CAP, if at all," he said.

Of course it's possible the New York Times is wrong, but before some of you break out the champagne to celebrate? You might want to chill it for a bit longer....

UPDATE:

Just as I finished this, Senator Specter just stated that Kennedy staff went thru the records at the Library of Congress and did not find Alito's name on any documents, or any lists and his name was not listed on any of the minutes of the meetings.