No more having to leave that favorite pair of cuticle scissors or that handy dandy screwdriver out of your carry on bag. Alas those of you who have Swiss Army type knives will still be forced to either check your bag or leave your implement of choice behind.
It doesn't seem to make alot of sense as to the reasoning, the original ban on scissors and just about everything else came after 9/11. Now the TSA is saying:
"I am convinced, that the time now spent searching bags for small scissors and tools can be better utilized to focus on the far more dangerous threat of explosives," said TSA Director Kip Hawley.
Granted I thought the ban on such small items served no purpose anyway but there were no explosives use during 9/11. Nor am I aware of any incidents with explosives in recent US airtravel.
The pilots union agrees with this change:
Bob Hesselbein, the union's national security committee chairman, said pilots think it's more important to focus on passengers' intent rather than what they're carrying.
"A Swiss army knife in the briefcase of a frequent flyer we know very well is a tool," Hesselbein said. "A ballpoint pen in the hands of a terrorist is a weapon." (However Swiss Army knives and other small knives are still banned)
Some don't agree with restoring these items to a carry on status:
"I have not spoken to a flight attendant at any airline that isn't outraged by this," said Thom McDaniel, president of Southwest Airlines flight attendants' union, Transport Workers Local 556. "They want to focus more on explosives, but they're not even mentioning that the biggest threat to commercial aviation right now is still the fact that most cargo is not screened."
While I don't see scissors under 4 inches as a huge threat, Mr. McDaniel makes an excellent point. You can screen every passenger, yet if they are not screening cargo it is really a "let's make this publicly look like we are doing something to make flying safer".
Congress is of course going to get involved in this, some of them don't believe you can be trusted with scissors or tools under 7 inches.
Reps. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Joseph Crowley, D-N.Y., said Thursday they intend to introduce a bill to preserve the current list of items barred from the cabin.
"The Bush administration proposal is just asking the next Mohamed Atta to move from box cutters to scissors as the weapon that's used in the passenger cabin of planes," Markey said, referring to the leader of the Sept. 11 hijackers.
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson, R-Texas, said allowing sharp-pointed scissors and similar objects on planes "could undermine the progress we have made in securing our skies since the 9/11 attacks."
"The change in policy would do little to alleviate screening delays, since screeners would need to stop the conveyor belt to check whether the scissors in question fell within the new limits," she said in a letter to Hawley, urging him to drop the idea.
I just can't wait for the hearings on this issue. Congressional time spent on the danger of cuticle scissors and small tools could very well be a huge turning point in the safety and direction of our nation....
Sharing my sharp point at:
Third World County (Make sure you turn your speakers up when you visit)
Bloggin' Out Loud (One of the few people I would shave a Yeti for)
Stray Dog (Smarter than your average Slimy Mollusc)
9 comments:
This is a bigger issue with those on the front lines (the cabin staff) than it is to those behind the locked cabin door; funny thing, that...
This also sharply points to the bigger problem which cuts to the bone of the unscreened cargo in the belly of the plane.
Also at issue is the arbitrary 4" size limit; most people understand how deadly even 4" can be, when wielded by a competent and skillful operator...
:-)
That's true, HT but a highly trained person can also use a ballpoint pen or even a pencil as a deadly weapon. A belt could even be used by grabbing a passenger or flight attentendant and choking them to death with it.
The only way to prevent this type of thing totally would be to not allow any carry ons of any time and make everyone fly naked.
:-)
The world changes; the reality is that extreme (in our eyes) measures have to be taken to protect the safety of passengers. So the gov't or airlines or both can implement rules and we have to follow them. Or we can choose to find some other mode of transportation. Nothing is stopping us from getting out own pilot's license and flying ourselves around with all the knives we want. lgp
Or Lyn, we could make friends with someone who has a plane and then have them fly us around with our scissors, knives and other assorted tools.
:-)
People have to fly naked. That is the only way we will be safe.
I think there are some things like nail clippers and such that aren't any more dangerous that other items you can carry on, but scissors may be pushing it
My judgement is perhaps clouded by my frequent viewing of "Alias," by I don't see how the measures we have today can actually be used to claim that we're safer. Like others have mentioned, just about anything could be used as a weapon in the wrong hands and much of what's in the belly of the plane isn't being checked.
I don't fly (not because of 9/11), so my oppinion really doesn't matter I guess. If flyers feel safer, then I guess it's a bonus. If they really aren't safer, then it's not worth all the hassle. It seems to me these measures are great at keeping the petty criminals under wraps, but the more skilled and strategic criminals will find ways around our current approach.
Though flying naked could be fun. It would certainly add a new element to all the personal conversations you can overhear on a plane.
lol Stephanie, flying naked could add a whole new meaning to "flying the friendly skies"
:-)
"The only way to prevent this type of thing totally would be to not allow any carry ons of any time and make everyone fly naked.
From my point of view, that would be cool.
From the view of my fellow passengers, they could easily be repulsed.
But, I give a superb nekkid full body massage! (or, so my girlfriend tells me...)
Post a Comment